QURAN ALONE ISLAM AND UNIVERSAL MONOTHEISM, WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Ove Karlsen, 30.march 2014
GOD HAS NO SECOND PARTNER.
God has no second partner, and that is what an analysis of religion says aswell..
and the natural man existed ofcourse first of created men, and no doubt
they discussed God, as today. Adam was a prophet says The Quran.
history we see that the fertilitycults came with doll -like idols, and
distortions of monotheism, where dolls where placed in pyramids,
or so-called ziggurats, at a higher levels, because it corresponded to
a distortion of "god" in the polytheists symbolic world. The dolls
were just about sex and ofcourse an irrational element.
first God known by name, is Dyeus. Which means The Divine.
Reconstructed by researchers and set to about -5000 BC in
proto-indo-european society. At this time, we see the typical
distortion of monotheism , where Dyeus is a main god, among several
minor gods. The typical distortion of monotheism everywhere . Here also
circular buildings, for hunting and "sacrifice". Dyeus society is said
to consist mostly of priests, warriors, and farmers or animal owners.
is next, and a regional variation on Dyeus, about -4000 BC in Turkey.
In later Greek
mythology, Dyeus becomes Zeus. Now highly associated with many
varieties of distorted religion, many idols, which is really just
distortions again of monotheism.
Highly mythologized, and again the basis for several other
varieties of the same. Idols borrows qualities of God, and
is portrayed as strong and associated with lightning or storms at
sea, and similar things .
In ancient Egypt idolatry is also at
its peak, with almost everything revolving around idols. Where
Pharaoh poses as a mythologized variant of "God" from the top
of a pyramid. Based on irrational customs that they believed they
became "God" by. Probably a misunderstanding of esoteric verses about
conscoiusness and "soul ". And in a very irrational
construct of very distorted monotheism, with many added idols, and a
whole society, based on the symbolic polytheism.. An entire city as one
Dyeus and Tengri also becomes Dyaus and Indra in Hinduism .
All polytheism in that sense is really just based on, and distortions of monotheism .
also known as Ibrahim Zardosht around -2200 BC writes down, in the
beginnings of written religion, and writing, monotheistic religion that
says "God is One, Without A Second Partner". It becomes very
influential, starting both Zoroastrianism (Gathas) becomes a
central aspect of Hinduism (Brahman is one without a second), and
is also the basis for "The Abrahamic Religions".
beginnings of typical monarchic symbols like "crown" is also seen in
Abrahams time, and represents polytheism, and highly associated with
"gay" prostitutes, that poses as fertility-cult idols. (Satanic.)
Dyeus in the
form of Zeus also becomes Jupiter and Jove, and later Yah
(without piter) and Yahwe, and Moses talks about the religion of
Abraham, around -1500 BC.
And Jesus says, "Your Lord is One", around the beginning of our time accounting.
becomes the god of Khans in China, warriors, that later became
kings with thoughts about bloodrelations and more
typical monarchy, based on idolaters distortions from
fertilitycults, and similar new distortions. Also, later known as
Buddha also writes Dhammapada, probably not so much before or after this, also using typical monotheistic wording.
Also Laozi writes Dao De Jing, around the same time. Also with a lot of typical monotheistic wording.
Aristotle teaches "Lex Naturalis " and "Primum movens" 400 AD.
in Norway, we get a variant of Dyeus and Tengri, probably from the
chinese branch of Tengri, called Odin and Thor, where China is
referred as Asia, and Asgard, and that is also connected to lightning
and thunder. Originally really the same one, but mythologized as
600 AD, Mohammed, the last prophet, delivers The
Koran, with religion with a language for the people of
his time, which corrects many distortions in Abrahamic religion. And
states "everything in the heavens and the earth is subjected to God,
willingly or not". With the name of the religion
being "submission" and that "Abraham named them subjected
Allah, as Dyeus means "The Divine".
facts about religion, one sees that all religion is connected, and that
there really is no polytheism, and that religion really is universal,
and about naturality.
Therefore religion can also exclude
unnaturalness, things that are fantasies, that is not a part of natural
behaviour. Which ofcourse is the conservative stand
against promiscuity, homosexuality, intoxicant-use, exceeding
limits and general low morale.
Unfortunately, there are new
developments all the time, and new distortions, such as "the
companions" of Islam. And in Norway some even talk about "Thor and
Odin" still, as if it is about "Norwegian" identity National
Romanticism and nationalism are related. And Hitler again worships
ancestors in the form of "the aryan race", and Stalin talks
about serving the commune. Indeed, also in "open source"
, with the self-appointed "nice nerd" Linus Torvalds, criticism of
"free software" is censored, while the people at the bottom works for
free, and on top they earn a lot of money.
And Einstein and similar
attribute qualities to the universe that only God has. The
universe is ofcourse created and has an end, as religion ofcourse
also is about. E=mc2 or black holes or similar mathematical
misconstructions are from irrational pantheistic mathematics.
observations that "the stars are just a small part of the universe" is
correct. Also in The Quran as "We decked the lower heaven with stars."
And The Quran also states that "everything is counted".
psychiatry they claim to know something about demons, while the
oversexualized society get little moral correction from their
libido-view. Rather the reverse, while "experts" talks about
sex in the media. While people bothered by demons get well without
"medication", just by following monotheism .Which was the original
religion and source on Satan, the lustfollower and demons. There
is both submitted and polytheistic demons, states The Quran .
Most people who have talked about this, has also said that it is not
only negative. And while people are channeling demons in many cultures,
it is common in Norwegian culture, to suppress freedom of religion
here, and claim "madness" and instead abuse people
from atheistic perspective. In that sense, Norway is
a facist state, that many norwegians complain about in the
form of other countries. Itself ofcourse a demon. And
ofcourse religion is needed and moral guidelines over a long
time to correct this.
Without any societies pantheon and
distortion of religion, there are ofcourse no satanic demons, only man
as God created him. - God , far above any pantheon. He has no
The only relevant for all levels and spheres. God, Lord of existing things.
thus submission is about naturalness, and God created man with
submission as a natural religion states The Koran.
And this must be the only unpretensious human ethics.
Praise be to The One God .He needs no partners.
God is Lord of the east and west, and there is no other God .The Beneficial, The Most Merciful.
QURAN ALONE ISLAM
"We shall show them our verses in the horizon, and in themselves, until they know they are true" (41:53)
No hadith is necessary, in Quran Alone Islam. And that is what we see in this verse in The Quran aswell.
was astray Sufis that launched the hadith-based intepretation now known
as the difficult sects, focusing on "predecessors", persons
in weak hadith texts. This is the typical ancestral-worship, of
facists and idolaters/totemists. Also known as ultranationalists.
This was mainly done after Rumi claimed to be God, in an
area that later became The Ottomans. Rumis Diwan, "Ghazal"
(lovepoetry) #1827 shows Rumi to be a promiscuous gay.
Rumi was recognized as the same as
Baal, who was a prostitute that claimed to be "lord", a name his
father made up, among several of his children, in Abrahams time. Baal
is the moon-symbol in the Ottoman flag. Also known as Hubal.
by "Ghazali", they lanched the "yearning for an ideal" that together
with sufi-lovepoetry became "the love of sahaba" we know
today, that really has a gay basis. Satan follows his desire
(Quran), so the idol is typically gay. Since Bukhari is full
of errors, and it states "Uthman collected The Quran", when The
Quran states God collected The Quran, (and Mohammed follows
it in his time), The Ottoman sufis probably wrote Bukhari
and it is a false name and false texts.
vs Quran: (75:16..75:19) http://islamawakened.com/quran/75/17/default.htm
problematic sects have very difficulties in understanding this, and
their claims of being muslim, are very unserious. They have
offended so many, so please verify, so we can get rid of this "gay
bimbo" "Islam". Satan follows his desire (Quran).
The "Ishtar-gate". Ishtar was Baals relative, usually part of idolaterous symbolism, related to Baals prostitution.
sufi mosque, decorated similary. And people have even stated that they
"think about sex" in the mosque. Baals temple was that of
Ishtar is also Lat, Manat, and Al-Uzza
YUSUFALI: Have ye seen Lat. and 'Uzza,
YUSUFALI: And another, the third, Manat?
YUSUFALI: What! for you the male sex, and for Him, the female?
YUSUFALI: Behold, such would be indeed a division most unfair!
These are nothing but names which ye have devised,- ye and your
fathers,- for which Allah has sent down no authority
(whatever). They follow nothing but conjecture and what
their own souls desire!- Even though there has already come to them
Guidance from their Lord!
The “sufi caduceus” really being symbolism earlier called "Ningizzida" related to Baal and Ishtar aswell.
symbolism in hadith, try to cover over The Quran, and instead lead to
gay lustcultivation. Without Bukhari, without "love of
sahaba", without crazy self-neglecters, they would be
decent people, if they tried to follow real Islam. And they would
know the worship of God. That is what Islam tries to establish.
That is what they bow and submit to God for, so that they shall
increase in faith. (External) Hadith is only blocking that
(kufr). They are really worshippers of idols, in hadith texts,, and
have a pantheon in the "sahaba", and they might aswell make up carved
And God controls all forces in the heavens and the earth.
art “Battle of Nicopolis” also have many gay sexual allusions.
Ottomanian art “The king has gone impotent”, seems to allude to
that the “king” is instead having sex with the man on his right.
has actually happened many times in history. Much Japanese Samurai art
is gay, and in christianity, Cranach The Elder (1472 –
1553), made even worse art, that was supposedly “christian”.
gay practise of “bathhouses” and toiletsex is common in Ottoman culture
also. ”The “tellaks” (young boys who helped men to
have a bath) did not only work for washing the men. They also
served as male prostitutes. There is a book in the Ottoman archives
called “Dellakname-i Dilkusa” (The Record of Tellaks). It tells
about the most famous “tellaks” of Istanbul. The way they serve
their customers, their price..”.
are also known for Köçek: A gay prostitute, more popular than (veiled)
belly dancers, dancing at intoxicant-taverns. ”Often
acrobatics, tumbling and mock wrestling were part of the act. The
köçeks were available sexually, often to the highest bidder..”
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6%C3%A7ek) Rumis whirling ofcourse
includes his garments whirling up.
God also destroyed Sodom (and Gomorrah) which worshipped Baal.
Baal is also compared to a dog in The Quran.
had We willed, We would surely have elevated him therewith but he clung
to the earth and followed his own vain desire. So his
description is the description of a dog: if you drive him
away, he lolls his tongue out, or if you leave him alone, he (still)
lolls his tongue out. Such is the description of the people
who reject our verses. So relate the stories, perhaps they may
Rumi also states "There is a hidden treasure deep within the earth” – “It is Love”.
Followers of philosophies based on these, such as Osama Bin Laden, are often depicted with swellled cheeks.
”And swell not thy cheek (in pride) at men, nor walk in insolence
through the earth; for Allah loveth not any arrogant boaster”.
the pakistani doctor who helped catch Bin Laden is in prison for
this, showing that Pakistan (politicians) seems inclined towards
these irrational interpretations of Islam.
Turkish politicians seem inclined toward similar “muslim brotherhood”
type interpretations, criticising Egypt for military intervention
with Mohamed Morsi.
Baal is central to decadence and distorted religion:
Elias was most surely of the messengers, he asked his people: ‘do you
not fear (God)?, will ye call upon Baal and forsake the best of
creators, God is your Lord and the Lord of your fathers, the
ancients. But they rejected him, and they will certainly be
called up (for punishment), except the sincere and devoted servants of
God (among them), and we left (this blessing) for him among
generations (to come) in later times, peace be upon Elias.”
—Qur’an, Chapter 37, Verse 123-130
Hadithism point-by-point refutation:
the idolaters (nonbelievers) The Quran states: “God has put a block on
their minds, and on their hearing and eyes is a veil”. (2:7)
No doubt worshipping an idol, or a totem, is an immense mentality block.
Sunnism has 5-prayer hadith, which include obsessive-compulsive like repetitions.
5-prayer hadith, also resembles the biblical Moses going back and forth
to Pharao, and seems inspired by it. Hadith-writers seems to
largely have made this up, distorted, or been inspired by various
other things, also distorted variants of Zoroastrianism where
there also are 5 prayers.
The Quran has 3 prayers:
#1,#2,#3 i 011.114, 017.078
#1 i 017.079
#1, #2 i 050.039
#1, #3 i 024.058, 030.017, 024.036, 076.025
#2, #3 i 030.018, 038.018
#2, #3, #1, #2 i 020.130 (#1 & #2 er is repeated, notice that
praising, is repeated, and that the times stated are repeated.
The Bible also mentions three prayers.
has ritual washing (wudu) with each prayer, when the Quran, states to
wash before morning prayer. (5:6) Where ofcourse modern shower
will do the job. This is common many places, even without The
Quran being known, and is a good example of how sunnis/sects work
against Gods religion, when established naturally, and try to replace
it with deviance.
Sunnism has a confession of faith.
Quran calls them hypocrites (63:1). Does a new adherent to Islam, know
that Mohammed is Gods messenger? Ofcourse not, therefore they
cannot witness to this. Indeed, instead those “firm in knowledge”
state that the entire Quran is from God. And only the intelligent
Sunnism has “sunna Mohammed”.
has “Sunnatullah”, and forbids “sunna Mohammed”, and dedication to the
prophet instead of God. (3:79). Mohammed is Gods messenger, and
thus ofcourse teaches about Gods ways (sunnatullah), and has no
Sunnism has hijab.
The Quran does not use hijab
about headwear, but hijab means barrier. (33:53). The expression
Muhajabah reflects also this very poor interpretation, which then would
mean “barrier for God”. The verse must ofcourse be interpreted
to, that if you have a questionable person in the house, that
harasses you and your near, with unfitting questions about
marriage, it is perhaps best that the women go to another room, or
that the discourse goes on outside? Many also interpret hair to
be problematic in a verse, talking about "modesty", however
ofcourse, sensible people understand the verse about ornaments
(or similar translations), to be about nakedness, which is ofcourse the
only thing that would be an issue, when “stamping ones feet” is a
problem when it draws attraction to these "ornaments".
Quran in a context about conservative clothing also states “so that you
shall be recognized as people”. And indeed, that is what
conservative clothing is about today aswell. And a conversative
society considers itself more civilized than barbaric
barebreasted tribes. That is no doubt what this verse is about. And
conservative clothing is also in the verse saying "lengthen your
garments". And ofcourse no “cleavage” which is ofcourse is
typical in western societies. Only gaining attraction as a subhuman
sexobject, rather than a person. Which is completely insensible.
That is the correct interpretation, that harmonizes with other verses.
say they hijab also because they identify with “nuns”. In The Quran it
clearly states, God did not ordain monasticism (57:27)
also complain about sweaty heads. A sunni-sectarian claimed as a
moderator of a sunni forum, one should not complain and wear it
still. The Quran argues cleanlyness, and decency. Again
failure to understand Quran, and praises and worship of God, which
is ofcourse what monotheism is about. Not satanic customs. If one
wears it for sensible reasons, there is nothing wrong with that
The Quran also has verses about the “shade of a palm-tree” in paradise, where no sweaty hijabs are.
are actually often linked to
Historically it is linked to prostitution in the bible.
Genesis 38.15: When Judah saw her, he thought she was a prostitute, for she had covered her face.
veil used in marriage, often indicates sex, and veils were also used by
princesses to symbolize that she was to be given to a knight or
hero among the people.
Instead of “modesty” ofcourse, many
hijabis talk about symbolizing their “womanness” with the veil,
which is ofcourse really the same. Sexual symbolism, and offensive.
Indeed many women who “put on the veil”, even talk about doing
this for her husband, and his sexual pleasures, rather than God.
“Womaness” is ofcourse similar to the focus of a
fertilitycult-idol. And that is what the christian "virgin" Mary is
also, depicted with veil and child.
“Tunisian Women Go on
‘Sex Jihad’ to Syria” was in the news aswell, where the same
hardcore salafis women in a hadithist group called “Mother Aisha” sleep
with 20-30-100 men, in what is called “jihad al-nikah” and come
home pregnant. Aisha is only described in hadith, and
ofcourse here represents a typical fertility-idol, and the
ultra-promiscuity of idolaters. Satan follows his desire.
Rootsymblism may be about genitalia.
red riding hood" being eated by the wolf, is hallucinogenic symbolism,
the hood symbolising vagina. The wolf really symbolising satan,
the eating the damage of hallucinogenic poison, and the male
version is the sorcerer. A pointy hat, symbolising the male
genital. Ofcourse without any other practial use, so symbolic.. “Alien
abduction” is a modern variant of the same, and similar things.
Satan in this form, must ofcourse be rejected. It is deviant, and
has nothing to do with the natural behaviour of God, that is
according to Gods praises.
Sometimes pirates, the phantom blot,
or other “hijab”-wearers are popular among sectarians, because
they wear hijab, not understanding the lacking moral element. And
coupling this to hadith where Mohammed is said to be a robber, suddenly
the robber also is loved, and satan worshipped, as one “fills
ones heart with love (worship) of sahabah (the ancestors)”, as
idolaters. And this is probably a good reason why there are muslim
gangs, that claims religious origin. So if you see a “muslim”
dressing as a pirate, or thinking gansta-rap is something, there
is a very illogical reason behind. He thinks it is compatible
with his religion.
Some tailors have redefined this style of
clothing, and that is ofcourse what one should do, if one should
wear anything similar for practical reasons.
himba-people, headwear is still used to symbolize sexual conduct, and
with elements resembling typical “shamanic” hallucinogen-rituals.
The Himba people still talk of a God that does not have partners.
This is the typical association everywhere. With any association
of this type, the lustcultivation may still be under societal
rules, originally from monotheism, more or less. Such as
requiring marriage.”The burning love” some talk about in some
religious directions, is actually quite similar. Such as "Jesus
Culture" - "let yourself burn for God etc", or sufis like Rumi, is
really satanic, and the calling on demons. While some of these
may have beauty in their faith, ultimately demons will ruin them.
(4:117) They call on nothing besides him but idols, and nothing but a rebellious Shaytan.
has “circumcision”. It seems to be an idolateorus custom meaning
"recieving semen", as a gay idol (like Baal). The Quran (4:119)
does not even allow cutting in the ears of cattle, which is
Satan, then cutting in little babies penises should be strictly
forbidden. This can also be interpreted as a ban on genetic
Sunnism has external hadith.
The Quran is the
only of its kind, and has many verses against external hadith.
(7:203) (33:34) (17:88) (7:185) (6:115) (6:155)
Sunnism quickly calls others apostates, infidels, disbelievers etc.
The Quran forbids slander, and suspicion (49:12).
the same time, followers of sunnism often cover for eachother (because
this is in external hadith), and is therefore in conflict with
true testimony before God. (4:135). The same behaviour is
ofcourse also seen by Donald Duck, a cartoon charatcter inspired
by hallucinogens, who persecutes anyone who does not follow his
retarded rules. This is ofcourse also seen in Orthodox Jews, who
can´t switch the lightswitch on Sundays (Sabbath) and many other
odd and satanic rules. They actually require a "shabbos goy", that
CAN switch the lightswitch, because he is simply a heathen. This
ofcourse has very little to do with a religion of God, that is
about submission to a God, of the world, and actual reality.
often use the term “kufr” wrongly. Kufr, means covering over religion,
and is used about disbelievers. (polytheists). “You kufrs” are
often an expression used by sectarians. Ofcourse they kufr over
the truth all the time, and cover for each other all the time, or
as sahabah (“ancestors”) state in hadith “tell the truth about your
friend, and loose your friend”. - They will have no helpers on
the day of reckoning, as The Quran says. And “the love of
sahabah” is ofcourse similar to "the commune" of facistic ideology.
Which ofcourse to any sane man, is satanic and polytheistic.
Instead ofcourse worship of God, The Beneficial, The Most
Merciful, is Islam, whose word is The Quran.
Sunnism can be
interpreted to allow rape of prisoners of war. (known problem, and
defended by sectarians) Some also claim one can rape non-hijabis.
Some go as far as saying one can rape non-sunnis, which recently
was done by a salafi-leader in Syria.
The Quran equals promiscuity with infidelity/disbelief. (24:3)
No prostitution for slaves. (24:33) No lust-cultivation. (45:23).
No fornication, secret concubines (5:5)
Mohammed Asad translation:
70:29 And who are mindful of their chastity,
[not giving way to their desires] with any but their spouses – that is,
those whom they rightfully possess [through wedlock] -: for then,
behold, they are free of all blame,
70:31 whereas such as seek to go beyond that [limit] are truly transgressors;
Sunnism claims that the prophet was illiterate.
The Quran has verses about the prophet reading and writing. (96:4) (17:1) (96:1)
Sunnism claims that Utman collected The Quran.
Quran has verses about that God collects the Quran, after which
Mohammed follows it, in his time. This is also means that he must
have been able to read it.(75:16..75:19)
Sunnism has a concept
called “Buraq” a flying horse with human head. The Quran has no
such verses, and the verse that is interpreted by Sunnism to
revolve around Buraq, has nothing to do with “Buraq”. (The
prophet visits a mosque and reads verses (17:1) about Moses
Scripture (17:2)). The Buraq seems to be an old babylonian idol, also
mentioned in The Quran, that the angels Harut and Marut taught
about, to demonstrate show how the illusions of idolatry worked
“showing discord between man and wife”. (2:102) They later though
turned it into an idol, as The Quran states. The name may also be a
combination of Bori, and Balak, names of Baal and his father, and
may be a pedophile association. Variants of it is also seen among
some Zoroastrians, and Assyrians called "human-headed winged
lion". Earlier symbolism is a lion of Baal, and there is a
distorted concept of God there, which Baals father claimed to be,
and so hadith-distorters named it Buraq.
also often state that "angels are made of light", while The Quran does
not state this. The Quran does have verses about "God is the light of
the heavens and the earth". (24:35)
Sunnism has a whole of 6 other books, claimed relevant to Islamic law. (Sharia)
Quran states that one shall have no other judge than God, author of the
Quran (6:114-115). Also can be be understood in the modern sense,
that the Quran is the principal source of law. Not the other 6
books. But the sunnis also claim they are. Even setting the
fallible, a non-monotheistically correct words of hadith, over that of
God. In modern democracy we also have ofcourse the forementioned
principle “Lex Naturalis” which is completely compatible with
Islam, and is monotheism. Society has developed and indeed, no
idolaterous hadith about “sahabah” is superior, or better than the
people who has worked for the praises and religion of God, in it.
rational first cause argument “Primum Movens” that often is said to be
at the base of the school of logics, can also be reduced to that;
There must be one force, and it must be almighty, and therefore
only one. And is a very simple way to understand logical thinking
Sunnism has “5 pillars of Islam”.
The Quran mentions
no “5 pillars”. Instead it teaches universal monotheism. All
people have had their messenger. The Quran (10:47) and many other
places. Also The Quran (2:285): The Messenger believes in the
Guidance revealed to him from his Lord and so do the Believers.
They all believe in God, His angels, His books and His Messengers. They
say: “We do not discriminate against anyone of His Messengers.”
And they say: “We hear and we obey. Grant us Your forgiveness, O
Lord; to You we shall all return.” – No pillared hadith here.
Also in The Quran: God is He Who raised the heavens without any pillars
that you see.. (13:2)
Sunnism teaches emulation of people in hadith, and deviant behaviour.
Quran teaches ssubmission to God, Lord of The world, and a religion of
natural behaviour, where mankind is created according to this
pattern. (30:30). And where deviant behaviour is Satan, the
idolater and disbeliever. The polytheist of many strange
Sunnism teaches that people in hadith are the best.
The Quran teaches that The Godconscious are the best (49:13)
teaches “Gods messenger and partners” (prophet and sahabah, prophets
umma, the companions of the prophet, etc). And have gone from
claiming Mohammed in hadith explains the Quran, to expanding this
to his “partners” who also now is said to explain The Quran. All
the deviance, the sects are criticised for, one finds in hadith. And
looking at their theology, it is clear that they do not
understand The Quran or worships God, and his good names.
These people are not really muslim. Satan is a firedemon.
fundamental teaching of The Quran is, “God does not have partners”. The
whole salafism/hadithism/sahabaism is ofcourse ancestral worship,
and idolatry, which evolved to “king and fatherland”-idolatry,
and nationalism, and many of the same people are nationalists or
occupied with race. Which ofcourse are associated with extreme
ideologies such as nazism, and also which "royal bloodlines" are
a variation of. And maybe lesser known in the west, is that the
same racism, is the same in interpretations of Judaism, that
focuses on Judahs race. Which might just aswell be the aryan race. This
text deals with sunnism though, but the same irrationality in
Judaism or any other religion, philosophy or view on reality, is
ofcourse just as critiqueable. Even if these people call
themselves atheists, which really all this is. Disbelief, and what
polytheism is. Atheism is lalso ofcourse polytheism, claiming
objects are selfcreated and praise science, and other things, in
worship of several things that equate their gods.
also teaches that “music is forbidden” and interpret it in different
degree. Some mean only song “is not music”. Unfortunately there
is also “gangsta-rap muslim” that talks and behaves like drugs
and prostitution is central, and say it is legal because “rap is
not music”.This is ofcourse highly irrational, of the degree typical in
Art and culture can be fantastic and beautiful, and a
strong factor and driving force, for Gods cause. God himself says
that he supported David who was a prophet (!) and a musician (!).
Translation of 34:10 is a bit varying, so I quote the whole verse after my understanding:
“And we supported David with our grace, “O Mountains! Join him in his
praises of God! And you birds also! And We melted the iron for
People who have musical skill, should ofcourse be allowed
to work with that. David ofcourse worked with music, and in The
Bible, uses musical instruments. But ofcourse moderated by the
values of Islam, no-promiscuity, no-homophilia, no-intoxicants,
Sunnism: 4:34 is often interpreted as a verse that allows abuse.
“Among His signs is that He created for you spouses from among
yourselves, in order to have tranquility and contentment with
each other. He places in your heart love and care towards your
spouses. In this, there are signs for people who think.”
has a general theme of that misconduct, promiscuity, untrustworthyness,
belongs to the disbeliever. Disbelievers are forbidden to marry.
So 4:34 should be understood as, warn, stop marital relations, divorce.
has hadith about giving bones in charity, ordered by the messenger of
God, Lord Of The world. This clearly is attributing false
teachings to God. Imagine if we were to distribute bones to the
poor, as a welfare-state. Indeed the tax and charity in Islam,
are earlier versions of the same concept. But sunnis rather
uphold giving bones, which ofcourse is an insult, similar to a
button in collection for christians. One should ofcourse also
cultivate forth an economy based on healthy products, also food, and
not sell unhealthy food to ones citizens. The Quran contains
statements like “deal justly”, “don´t be niggardly”, etc.
has hadith about flies. Where if a fly enters your drink, just dip the
other wing, because it has the cure. So if the flies come frow a
cowdung, they claim one should dip the other wing. This is
ofcourse utterly repulsive, and says much about the level of
interpretation they accept as “Gods religion”. Mindless and satanic.
generally show little understanding of (32:9), which states that “then
he formed him, and breathed in him some of his spirit of life,
giving you hearing, sight and mind”. Instead most of them indeed
fiercely oppose any such notion. And many again talks of this as
disbelief. The sufis emphasise this, but then turns it into pantheism
which is wrong. Instead ofcourse the actual verse, should be
accepted instead of distorted “esoteric religion”. And the sufis
are known for lovepoetry, while The Quran calls the poets
deviant. Many of them popular among sunnis, despite their claims of
disbelief, not having the rational ability to connect these. And
the “love of sahabah” seems also to come from it. And many
criticise the sufis for taking “sufism” to the “red light
districts”. Ofcourse if Satan, the lustcultivator is present,
that is the natural direction. Many sunnis also believe in the
sufi-concept of “lower soul”, and mistakes it for “nafs”. “Nafs”
means self, not “lower soul”. Many sunnis do not understand and still
states “it is because of the nafs”, and starts talking about
desires and lower soul, and while the correct monotheism is
ofcourse all the verses about satanic demon.
Verses that correctly deal with many sufistic themes:
To God belongs the hidden of the heavens and the earth, and by him all
matters are decided. So worship him, and trust in him. God is not
ignorant of what you do.
(57:3) should probably read more like
“He is the first, and the last, the hidden and the present, and
he is fully aware all things”.
Phrases like “God holds the keys to the hidden”, should be translated with “hidden” aswell, probably.
It is He Who sent down tranquillity into the hearts of the Believers,
that they may add faith to their faith;- for Allahs is the
Forces of the heavens and the earth; and Allah is Full of
Knowledge and Wisdom;-
Some sufis also use the misconstructed term “Wali Allah”.
Quran: “Know you not that it is God to Whom belongs the dominion of the
heavens and the earth? And besides God you have neither any Wali
(protector or guardian) nor any helper.” (32:4)
note that translations of “heavens” denote plurality in the original
scripture. As The Quran has seven heavens “created above
“Allah is He Who created seven heavens, and earths
as many. The command descends through all of them, so you
may know that Allah has power over all things and that Allahs
knowledge covers all things. (65:12)
Other translated statements distorted to support sects/idolatry/pantheism, should be ignored.
(26:78) It is he who created me, and he who guides me.
Everything in the heavens and the earth is in submission to God. (3:83)
Sufis often think they can override the morality of The Quran, and in no way is this true ofcourse.
God sustains the heavens and the earth, unless they collapse, and if
they should collapse, no one can sustain them after him.
And Paradise replaces the heavens and earth. (3:133)
hasten to forgiveness from your Lord; and a Garden, the wastness of the
heavens and the earth, that is prepared for those who are
Islam ofcourse also means “Submission”.
Quran states: Allah is the caretaker of those who believe. He bringeth
them out of darkness into light. As for those who disbelieve,
their patrons are false deities. They bring them out of light
into darkness. Such are rightful owners of the Fire. They will
abide therein. (2:257)
Most of these groups have gone far away
from The Quran, follow instead sectarian Imams, and claim
“Mohammed is their leader”. While ofcourse in The Quran, it is God who
gives guidance, and whom one prays to for the right lead.
are proud, to manage doing their 5-prayer ritual with obsessive
compulsive repetitions. (many sectarians also claim they suffer
In The Quran, Satan is of the proud, while God states he
has made religion easy (submission). And The Quran also states
that the prayer of disbelievers is in vain, and that “God guides
In Sunnism one is not allowed to interpret.
So the usual retoric from sunnis is “I am not allowed to
interpret, but this verse says..” – While The Quran says, “for those
who reflect”, “for those who posess sense”, “hast thou no sense”,
“so that you may reflect”, and that the disbelievers have “minds
they do not use”, etc.
Also for some reason in sectarian forums,
camels seem to be very popular, and some state “where God guides
my camel”. Please do not follow your camel. Submit to God, Lord of
The world. That is Islam. And instead ofcourse (7:40) "To those
who reject our letters and treat them with arrogance, no opening
will there be of the gates of heaven, nor will they enter the
garden, until the camel passes through the eye of a needle: Such is
Our recompense for those in sin.
Sunnism claims that the Quran was revealed in 23 years.
Quran says it was revealed in the month of Ramadan.. And with the exact
phrase, “as a guidance for mankind, with clear verses and the
criterion”. Not hadith. And ofcourse being the clear verses and
criteria itself. Not hadith. (2:185) And ofcourse all the hadith
that claims to speak of these 23 years are false.
The Quran is also called “The Furqan” since it distinguishes between right and wrong (25:1), also in (3:4), (8:29).
Let there arise out of you a band of people inviting to all that is
good, enjoining what is right, and forbidding what is wrong.
Ye are the best community that hath been raised up for mankind. Ye
enjoin right conduct and forbid indecency; and ye believe in
(2:225) The right direction is henceforth distinct from error.
ofcourse the illogical logic of following hadith, when there were no
hadith in Mohammeds time, and he himself follows The Quran.
(7:203) and his wifes (33:34), and GOD says to follow The
Quran (75:18) and that he will explain it. (75:19). – No hadith.
Sunnism many claim that “hikma” means hadith, despite of the above
verses, and obvious logic. Hikma means wisdom, and The Quran,
refers to itself as wisdom. And the distortions are ofcourse
In Sunnism many believe in a return of Jesus because this is in hadith, and alter Quran-verses to support it.
The verse as it is distorted as in many translations:
(Jesus) shall be a Sign (for the coming of) the Hour (of Judgment):
therefore have no doubt about the (Hour), but follow ye Me: this
is a Straight Way.”
While clearly, looking at the verse, it
follows the previous verse, and it is angels that would be a sign
of judgement day. No return of Jesus in The Quran.
The right meaning and translation:
43:60 And had We willed We could have replaced among you angels to be viceroys in the earth.
43:61 That would indeed be a sign of the Hour. Have no doubt about it, and follow Me. This is the right way.
often uphold a hadith that states that the initials often seen in The
Quran can not be translated. However they often indicate the
content coming. For instance a translation would be “T.T.B.
(T)his is (t)he (b)ook, which is a guidance..”
Sunnis also often
claim the "We" used in the Quran is "royal". I think one should
avoid that association, but rather when a messenger speaks on the
behalf of another, and agrees, then ofcourse it is "We".
Sunnis have hadith about Mohammed being bewitched, stating Mohammed says:
water was red.. and the date-palm trees look like the heads of
devils”. Some of this seems borrowed from descriptions of
hell. Mohammed a messenger of God, and establisher of peace, in a
hellish state? Such a graceful message, must be a joy to deliver, and
this is obviously wrong. Some hadith say he turned “red in the
face before the revelations came”. And “heard bells”. Several
hadith claims he was suicidal, because his uncle died, and he had
recieved “revelations”. That sounds like an ill man. Nowhere does such
a state, lead to revelations. It does however resemble how
“berserkers” are described aswell. Which also are known for their
“jihad”. “Sunna Mohammed”? I hope not.
The Quran states: “The evil
say: You follow a man bewitched.” (25:8) Obviously these
evil people must have written a lot of hadith, and that is who
sunnis follow, when they follow these hadith. Quran (81:22): Your
companion is not mad.
Sunnis often have an interpretation that
disallows faces on pictures. Where they have cut off their heads
on the pictures, that otherwise stands on tables as elsewhere, which
is bizarre. This has nothing to do with The Quran at all. It may
come from the interpretation that Mohammed is not to be depicted.
Which is not in The Quran either. And they are to follow his
“sunna”. Which already is explained, that there is no such “sunna”.
However as intepretation got worse and worse, people started
cutting off their heads on pictures aswell. Headless idols are in
early fertilitycults aswell, where ofcourse intelligence is not
used. Idolaters have ears, eyes and minds they do not use. We have
ofcourse photograps today, and they do not need to be extremely
large ofcourse. A more document-oriented size, is fine many
places. And better no image, than a headless one ;) Also, in
these internet days, one should be careful of sharing information
online, as one has the potential to reach all of the world, and
their critics. Personal blogs, and chats seem to be bothered by
unserious writers, commenters and moderators, without any knowledge of
law and demorcratic or theocratic structures.
“kiss” the house of Abraham when on “hajj”. Being obscene with peoples
houses, sleeping on the ground, and throwing rocks. These were
not the original happenings here, and sense must be used in
conjunction with this. These customs are from hadithists. And in
this people are even stampeded to death! And Bacca is the name of
the place of The Kaba, while "Mecca" a valley.
Quran: (3:19) Surely the (true) religion with Allah is Submission, and
those to whom the Book had been given did not show opposition but
after knowledge had come to them, out of envy among themselves;
and whoever disbelieves in the communications of Allah then
surely Allah is quick in reckoning.
And again no hadith, for Islam. The Book, as in all the other verses.
sunnis believe in “abrogation”, and claim verses of The Quran, are
replaced by other verses of The Quran, and are irrelevant. The
Quran: “No abrogation” (2:106)
Many sunnis believe Mohammed
performed a “splitting of the moon miracle”, according to hadith.
Referring (54:1), which usually is poorly translated. Instead it is
about The Day of Reckoning, and these clearly false stories
of Mohammed must be disregarded.” The hour is near, and the moon
is cleft”. Cleaved in two, probably a rendition of "half".
sunnis claim that Allah is the only right name of God. Allah is a
contraction of Al Ilah, which means The Divine. Arabic speaking
christians also use Allah. So it equates God. "God" is a regional
variation of other terms that also meant "The Divine", so most
likely the same.
The Quran: Call on Allah, or call on The Most
Merciful, Whichever name you call, to him belongs all good names.
God,sent down revelations delivered by prophets,
to all people, then ofcourse using native language. And The
Prophet and messenger Mohammed, was the last messenger. (2:213)
Sunnis claim that there was satanic
verses in The Quran, and Bukhari hadith states that polytheists
bowed in prayer with them, when they heard these verses. As if Mohammed
was completely ignorant, and did not follow The Qurans most basic
teaching "do not attribute partners to God". This is ofcourse
completely made up. Not only do the verse deny the idols gay
distribution of “men for men only, and females for the idol”, but if
these verses instead supported these polytheistic idols, as
“exalted cranes” it would support gay men for men only. And this
Bukhari claimed they bowed to. It is ofcourse offensive. The
Quran goes on to say that their ancestors made it up. And one gets an
idea of the typical morality of idol-worshippers. On wikipedia,
Allat-idols seem to be a variation on Ishtar-idols. Al-Uzza seems
like a more greek/roman style idol, and an
“Aphrodite”/”Venus”-variation of the same, Afrodite also being Ishtar.
And Manat was said to be a wife of the idol Hubal (Baal), and
Anat, Tanit is also an alternative name of Ishtar. Elsewhere also
Ishtar and Baal is worshipped, for instance in Sodom. Hubal might
be a variation of the names Ishtar (Hu) and Baal, Ishtar often depicted
as standing on top of Baal.
According to various sources
Sodom worshipped fertility-gods, chief among them were
Baal/Ashtoreth (Astarte, Asherah, Ishtar, Aphrodite, Venus, Qetesh,
Shauskha, etc are other names of the same, widely problematic
idol at the time.) This was the female goddess of war and
fertility. Her temples were temples of prostitution and intoxicant-use.
Her worship practices was prostitution, with worshippers having
payed sex with Baal or Ishtar (mostly Baal it seems, while Ishtar
was advertised), or representatives. The priests or male
prostitutes, according to Unger, who were consecrated to her cult were
called qedishim, ‘sodomites’ (1. Kings 14:24; 15:12; 22:46
God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. And also in The Bible, the worshippers of Baal are executed.
today are ofcourse clubs where intoxicants are sold, and sexual
advertising, that sells a product using sex, to make money. On
average, really the same, and the whole of society that
prostitutes their own, because they think they will be idols, and
make money. Reflecting the lack of sense of all idolaters
ofcourse. In the extreme, it resembles satanic ritual abuse.
hadith itself can also be said to be slander, depicting Mohammed as a
Satan, and seen as a part of a trend, with many other hadith that
depicts him similary. And sects lack the sense to not include it
into their religion. Fiercely reacting at Mohammed-drawings, yet
defending the most offensive satanic and false depictions of him in
hadith. To claim “love of Mohammed and Sahabah” with such
stories, is ofcourse a clear mistake.
Mohammed is the seal of
the prophets. Sunnis have hadith that state “(Mohammed) washed
himself and I drank from the remaining water. I stood behind him and
saw the seal of Prophethood between his shoulders”. The
textwriter does not understand that “seal of the prophet” means
he was the final prophet, and delivered the final word of God. Not a
symbol on his back. The hadithcollectors does also not
understand, and none of the ones who has branded this “sahih
hadith”. Which means “sound (sensible)” and authentic. Which
ofcourse it is not. Not only does it claim it is a physical sign,
but the author states to have drunk from his washing water.
Obviously being an odd character, who does what few does. Many
hadith contain the same satanic imagery. Shia also has hadith where
Mohammed states Ali is “the seal of the believers”. Ofcourse this
is a similar wrong teaching. Ali was not the last believer.
states that there was 360 idols at the Kaba. 360 idols inside one
building is extremely rare, and found nowhere. Typically
idolaterous shrines contain only a few idols. Other hadith states
that there were idols in there, from biblical people shooting
divination arrows. Which sounds like the idol of Asshur. Some claim it
was a shrine to Hubal. The hadith that tells of Hubal also has
extreme exaggarations, claiming that a hundred camels was to be
sacrificed to consult the idol, and here also talk about spinning
or shooting arrows, to “get the answer” (?). What actually was
there, cannot be said ofcourse. But 360 must be wrong. There are
many wrong numbers in hadith. Since Hubal seems to be Baal, and
connected to Manat, Allat and Al-Uzza all variations on Ishtar, these
were probably the idols at the idolaterous Kaba. So since the
Quran mentions games of chance, and intoxicants, it was a typical
“temple of Ishtar”, maybe with a percursor to the Dart-game, gay
prostitution, and intoxicants, and idols (more like todays posters)
Instead of hadith, pre-islamic sources, before
hadith, seems to give a better historical picture, and also gives
some clues on who for instance, the sabeans were, (saba tribe)
etc. Thamud (a tribe). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
is also worth nothing that the word now known as “Gehenna” what is
translated as Hell, might have an origin, in ancient Jerusalem,
called “Valley of the Son of Hinnom”, where Baal (usually meaning
a gay prostitute who claimed to be a god) was worshipped. Sunnis
are influenced by Baal-worship from their hadith, and should
ofcourse have a serious personal acknowledgement to rid
themselves of it. And all influences of gay prostitute worship.
may have been part of a family-line that prostituted their own, and
Ishtar was his sister. When they are talked about as “gods”, this
might be better understood as “kings and queens” of fertility-cultism. Some art
suggests that Baal later may be a king (Shar-Kali-Sharri). This before the more
typical monarchic version today, where "the knight" gets "the
princess".. And this is really a stage between simpler
fertility-cults and monarchy. Earlier phase being
fertilitygod-worship, that becomes Göbekli Tepe / Stonehenge type
hunting/slaughter “sacrificial grounds”. Which later are citadels
and castles, in agricultural times. Such as the time of Baal and
Ziggurats. Ziggurats being facistic idolaterous contructs and
called “watchhouses” in Mandean (Manda-Yah, probably a variant reading
of Bibli-Yah, or The Book of God) litterature, while mandeans
have houses “of light”. And that people are paranoid
because of the other, no doubt due to their polytheistic stories,
and intoxicant-use. (A facistic citadel). And that this refined
to a “princess in a castle”-type scenario, because the prostitute
was worshipped, and they earned money and status this way. Maybe
until “the queen” was respected by idolaters, for that everyone
wanted her, and so it refined into a system where one of the idols of
the people, “heroes”, were picked, to get her. All really based
on an illusion of idols, and false religion, and no claims to any
land, is authentic.
Such themes are ofcourse forbidden in The
Quran, it is far above such things that belongs to idolaters.
Satan is an idolater, and “follows his desire” (Quran), and idolatry is
of Satan (Quran).
"Whore" is derived from Isthar also.
(Har) That makes both “whore” and “gay” derived of Ishtar, and
Baal (Sodom). Idolaters follow simply deviance.
In The Quran it is said about Sodom: “You have committed lewdness like none before you has committed”.
typical variant of idolatry seems in reality to be about prostitution,
and the fertility-gods of earlier people, are really less
developed versions of the same. And this which developed into
temples of prostitution, monarchy and intoxicant-use (idolatry)
and that later became bars and clubs, still present in many
modern democracies. Phrases translated as king, such as in Ebla, may
not be about monarchy though, since they elect these, more like a
democracy. One should ofcourse have intoxicant-free
alternatives, and bars and clubs are today the highest risk
place, of encountering blind violence and sexual diseases. And ofcourse
shame. Instead ofcourse one set things right for the possibility
of marriage in an early age, and the “legacy of Ishtar” will be
less attractive. And ofcourse the disbelievers are forbidden for
Sunnis often state a “sahih” hadith that claims
Mohammed said “I was given The Quran ,and its equal”. And often
claims this equal is hadith.
The Quran: “Say: If the whole of
mankind and Jinns were to gather together to produce the like of
this Qur’an, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they
backed up each other with help and support”. (17:88)
hadith is ofcourse the demons that equate liberal politics in many
places. Idols are many places in the world, and it is the same
distortion of religion. Without distortion there is only one
religion. Monotheism, decent and conservative human values.
Distorted religion serves only Satan, fantasy and unreality, and
Satan is an enemy to humans.
The Quran is unique, and ofcourse good guidance, in such a moral decay.
O ye who believe! Many of the rabbis and the priests devour the wealth
of mankind wantonly and debar (men) from the way of God. They who
hoard up gold and silver and spend it not in the way of God, unto
them give tidings of a painful doom.
That of having a dynamic
economy "spend of Gods provisions" make sense. People like Saddam
Hussein did not understand this, and Iraq should be happy to have him
removed. The money does no good lying unused. This actually is
true for movements like open-source aswell, which is a totemic
culture around a cow-idol of Stallman, where people low get
nothing, and people at the top get much, and only iterate
hacker-myths. It has no place in a dynamic economy either, and
should be rejected as society has rejected facism many
times.North Korea uses Linux now, and calls it "their own OS".
North-Korean leaders have killed their own family-members, and
Linus Torvalds is known for his temper, and statements on killing
for the littlest of things, like similar facist sects.
is a sect, and many of them believe in hadith about a “saved sect”
among 72. Some vary 73. 72 is from ancient egyptian idolatry that
states: “Osiris had been hunted down and hacked to pieces by his
rival brother Set with the help of 72 accomplices”.
In The Quran, sects are disallowed. (6:159) (30:32)
often talk about a hadith that talks about "99 names of God". This is
from a distortion of Tengri-religion, where there is "99 Tngri".
name sunni itself refers “Sunna Mohammed”, which does not exist, which
later grew to the ancestral worship of the “salafi” (ancestors).
These ancestor-stories are mostly made up and influenced by
idolatry of the time or earlier. In The Quran, it is stated
several times, that the idolaters were “just following in the
ways of their forefathers”. One of the prayers in The Quran is
also “must God not try us, as he has tried earlier generations”.
Sunnism, the rightly criticised “brother” of Islam. Do not follow any sects like them.
although Shia seem generally more rational, they too have their moments
of hadith. The general emphasis on “the imams” resembles a bit
the hadithism of sunnis, and many false hadith exist about
Ali.Tthere have ofcourse been shia imams, but the number is not
important, or much of the stories. While Khomenei seem to moderate
music according to what he believed to be muslim values. Khamenei
has stated that he thinks music is not related to Islam. Which
again seems like the common exaggarations from hadith. But
Shiism, and Irans Theocracy still represent some of the most
advanced mainstream interpretation of Islam today.
Unfortunately Khomeini still approved a flag, that still is a
totemic/phallic idol, that should have gone out with the monarchy.
in the west rarely seem to understand, and the liberal media continues
their decadent self-neglecting values. But the quranical
correctness of no overcommercialization, no decadent
marketing, no interests in banks, no psychology where religion is
crazy,and similar things, must ofcourse be respected.
"Quran Alone" directions must ofcourse also be criticised. Satan should
for instance, not be explained away, such as some sects, or sufis
that claim "satan is good", showing no understanding of the moral
lack of idolatry, or the facistic element. Or claims that "Satan
was an angel", ignoring the Quran, for distorted christianity. Some
also put emphasis on a “19 miracle” which I don`t see related to
Islam, as some start reading their names into the Quran by it,
and thus disqualifies as serious research. The original verse is
about 19 angels above hellfire. And the linguistic accuracy of the
Quran is evidence enough. (4:82). The former "fundamentalist"
Quran-alone “19″er Edip Yuksel, who agrees with much of this,
calls it infidelity, not to accept the 19-miracle, and goes into
fits about “the ungrateful” disbelievers. Having no idea, if
those he criticises are grateful to God or not. Showing he is
still the same fundamentalist.
And the online “free-minds” forum he
visits, that claims to be Quran Alone Islam, is led by Layth
al-Shayban who claims alcohol is legal in The Quran. This is also
unserious interpretations. They have also moderated in favour of
dangerous synasthesia-causing LSD-like drugs, refusing criticism.
In this forum, also also a group who calls themselves
“Quranists”, who support gays, and seem to be "gay" themselves. This
forum has no relevance to a serious follower of The Quran. I did
also discuss with their leader Farouk A. Peru, and he hid his
support of the gays, while on his website supporting them. And it
was quite a scene, where a satanic blackmetal-rocker feminist, or some
such thing, would come to his defense. Neither Satan, feminism,
homophilia or blackmetal is ofcourse Islamic. And ofcourse
neither “masculinism”, or idolatry, but rather Submission, To
God, Lord Of The world. The phrase Quranist seems mostly used by
them, and indeed nobody is a Quranist, any more than they are a
Biblist. Islamist is also a similar nonsensical phrase.
“Quran-alone” follower though, is something many use, and seems to
capture the most linguistically correct version, of this (more
rational) interpretation. Some also use the term “Ahle Quran”
(People of The Quran). Some also claim it is a liberal movement which
is wrong. The Quran has conservative values, no-promiscuity,
no-intoxicants, no-homophilia, no-criminality (transgression),
and teaches good behaviour, and conservative clothing. And
ofcourse monotheism and godconsciousness. God without partners. Islam
meaning Submission. In the original arabic, with peace as root
word, possibly giving a nuance of “Peaceful submission”. A
principle one can see in for instance, the Iranian revolution, which
is said to be non-violent. Which was ofcourse also about good
conduct and and conservative values, and so is also said to have
redefined the meaning of “revolution”. “I have submitted myself
to the Lord of The world” – (Abraham) Quran (2:131)
challenge that then comes, must be to respect actual monotheistic
developments, while removing the influence of unserious hadith,
or other unserious scholarships.
The best interpretation of
religion on average today, is somewhere between Shia-Islam and
Quran Alone Islam. In Shiism, criticism of hadith is often ujnderstood,
people like Sheik Feiz is generally understood to be irrational.
And they have a working theocracy with many muslim principles
involved. A "quranization" of this, would probbly be the best
development further, removing the idolatry of imams, or "be the
centerpiece" (idol) hadith of Ali, etc. (Obviously as made up.)
Al-Rai (the people of rhetorical theology) vs Ahl Al-Hadith (the people
of hadith) may be the historical version of the conflict. And
this is ofcourse rhetorical theology, and rejection of hadith and
"Ghazalis" absurd "finalization".
And absurd, discussions with the disagreeing have been.f
I wrote an article on the norwegian “utrop”-site, refuting extremism,
where I mentioned an irrational Imam on youtube, Sheik Feiz,
(another salafi) who claimed that Allah had two right hands, when
the Quran clearly states he allegorically has left and right, I
was again offended by these people who disagreed.. In the comment field
I also mentioned a hadith where Allah would get upset when one
went to natures “bathrooms” in groups. Again the sectarian would
defend it. The most feebleminded idiocy they will defend, and
provoke rational people, again ofcourse since "Baal" tries to provoke
gay intercourse. This is the only "god" they worshipped. They
never knew Allah. Later a sectarian wrote a response to the
article. Her article is full of contradictions, of the similar
lack of intelligence as Feiz, and it even uses gambling language. "I
see your 5 and raise you 10" etc. Obviously these sects attract
the most difficult of elements. A sectarian in Norway, was even
found using his social welfare money for gambling, while he tried
to run a vocal sectarian movement called "The Prophets Umma", which
also was a variation on the "sahaba"-worship.
She was a
moderator on the norwegian site Islam.no. Where also Basim Ghozlan has
made himself noticed with the statement “kill is a cuddleword”.
Because his father always told him that he should kill him.
quite a crowd there. Another who had moderator-status there, states on
her blog (Lene Tufte) “I thought Mohammed was born of a man”.
On the frontpage of Islam.no was embarrased children.
Amarzgououi states “fill your heart with the love of sahaba”,
supposedly a scientist, and proudly stated by some others,
however only enabling this bimbo/gay nonsense. Which really is
ancestor-idolatry. (satanic worship, salafism). Which is ofcourse
the extreme schism of many "nerds", who do not understand morality, but
rather are totemists, thinking the bully (facist) is his idol.
(also moderator i the same time period) herself has stated “Become
idols to your children”. (Idolatry being the one fundamental
thing that is forbidden in Islam).
Another woman stated she did not
understand Islam at home, but when she went to their mosque, she
understood it. When she got attention in the mosque, and got red in the
face. Believe it or not, but red faces and embarrasment seems
almost like an ideal there, together with "love of Sahaba", which
no doubt would turn shameful sooner or later.
Linda Alzaghari also
active at islam.no, argues that relationships to dark
footballidols behind parents back is good. Which is completely
unislamic, no muslim parents would agree. Instead it is ofcourse
bimbo, driven by desires, who advocates this. Satan follows his
Again also ofcourse, Shoaib Sultan, active at
islam.no speaks of genetic manipulation of humans, yet alteration
of Gods creation is forbidden in Islam. Amarzgououi also
states that cutting in babies penises, (circumcision) is strong
sunna, and “one cannot just ignore clear hadith” on this, abusing
his own children, in an act that has nothing to do with honest
worship or praise of God.
Maulana Tehsin claims to be an imam,
states not only “hadith is Gods word”, but that he is "not of the
godfearing", yet claims to be an “imam”. The Quran says its reading and
prayer is for godfearingness/godconsciousness, and a leader
(imam) of religious society says he is not godconscious? He does
though give the impression that he never really actually read The
Quran, but says senseless things, again a provocation, a follower of
Rumi, and for gay intercourse like Baal. God states "we assign
devils as intimate partners for disbelievers".
ofcourse not only islam.no, but the similarminded islamnet.no aswell
censors posts discussing this.. And Tehsin runs imam.no, with a
mindset more like Sheik Feiz..
Islamnet was also not allowed
as studentunion, at UIO, a university, after where Fahad Qureshi,
leader, claimed they were discriminated. And in their own forum, one
gets discriminated all the time. Clear Hypocrisy.
is ofcourse completely irrational, and one can understand those who are
concerned about the growth of such interpretations. PST
(Norwegian security service) labeled it a threat to the Norwegian
democracy, and one can clearly see that principles of freedom of
religion, and freedom of speech is not respected here.
has its name from “sunna”, (refuted above) which is in hadith-texts.
And hadith are very poor sources for historic events. Not
anything that would be accepted in the west, and that is the
typical western stand on hadith. Some sects talk about a science
of hadith, but one can obviously see that there is no such
science here. And there is no scientific or logical thinking
among those who uphold them. They think they even refute rational
thinking, as related to Islam, neglecting clear verses in The Quran
about "those with a clear mind", "those who posess sense", "those
who reflect", etc.
In my near 15 years of research and
discussion, I must have seem a thousand, and only found very few,
that seem related to anything authentic. And in the whole of this
time, hadiths have been mostly useless, and seemed indeed to
instead be the biggest obstacle to anyones Islam, since they
include many idolaterous elements. Also many of the populary
recited ones. And it seems difficult elements obsess with these, and
associate them with the Quran. Which is what idolatry is, and
strictly forbidden in The Quran.
To claim there is any
responsibility on believers, to believe in these, or sift them
out, or make some claims on which of them is real, or who the
author is, is ofcourse irrational. Hadiths must be seen as texts
outside Gods word, with narration chains added later, and the
same status as any text outside Gods word. And when subjected to
reason ofcourse, one finds them a highly unreliable source. And
no demand can be made to include them in any religious belief.
“If they turn away, your only duty is to deliver the message”. (16:82) (no hadith).
Indeed The Quran, states it is sufficient for Islam.
And God teaches The Quran.
55:1 The Most Merciful
55:2 Taught the Qur’an,
55:3 Created man,
55:4 And taught him eloquence.
Do right according to God, and do not follow the pseudo-muslim sects.
“If anyone desires another religion than submission, it will not be accepted of him” – (3:85)
is ofcourse a religion of universal concepts such as decency, honesty,
respectability. It has nothing to do with deviant sects.
In Islam, Satan is also called Iblis (The Despaired).
He said: “My Lord, for the reason that that you have misled me, I will
beautify for them what is on the earth, and I will mislead them
(15:40) “Except Your servants among them, the devoted ones.”
(15:41) He said: “This is a right way with Me.”
(15:42) “For My servants, you shall have no authority over them, except those who are misled and follow you.”
(15:43) “And that Hell shall be their gathering place, all of them.”
(15:44) “It has seven gates, for every gate, a segment of them.”
(15:45) “The Rightheous (Those who do right) will be in gardens and springs”.
(15:46) “Enter it in peace and security.”
Praised Be God, The Lord Of The World,The Beneficial, Most Merciful.
He shares divinity with none.
Peace Be With You.
ANTI-PSYCHIATRY AND OUR OVERSEXUALIZED SOCIETY
has a basis in much nonsense. While Freuds Penis and Libodo, is
supposedly an approving totem, for an oversexualized society, and no
real criticism is done here, it only appeals to rapists and
anti-psychotics are based in LSD-like substances, and lobotomy.
While Jens (norwegian prime minister) himself praises "The Wall" hero Bob Geldof proudly.
problem goes deep, and down to the fact that Norwegian culture, has a
basis in distorted religion, just like "the east" is often said
to be negative, because of ancestor-worship (salafi), that really
is a fertility-cult.
Here an Africa-woman with her synasthesia-fertility-doll that means she wants children.
The egyptian "ankh" is really also a fertility-doll:
Still among as this:
in the Sigrid-trial (major media covered case in Norway) psychiatrist
Ann Lill Ørbeck, sat with a hallucinogenic ring on her,
supposedly voicing "expert" opinion. That symbolises
"psychiatrist" or something like that, to the reduced consciousness of
LSD users. Part of the same symbolism. The symbolism is a part of
what is called "the whispers of Satan". In other articles she has
hallucinogenic art, like one called "executive functions".
While she claims demons do not exist, she regularly speaks to them on LSD, and make art inspired by them.
things claimed good by Shamans are urotherapy (urine drinking) and
headelongation (conehead), and others. Completely without a
rational basis. Psychiatry has also believed in shock-treatment,
that also is completely nonsensical.
If one wants the
oversexualized society gone, and send a clear message to abusers,
one needs to fix these things. This is also what original
monotheism does. It has no crucifix, no fertilitydolls, sexidols,
underwear posters, gangsters in media, judaic star, pantheism or
other things. And encourages a conversative clothing style, and high
morality. Where Satan is a demon, which one shall not follow in
the footsteps of. And ofcourse this should be supported by
"fundamental democratic principles as freedom of religion, and
expression". Atleast that is a sentence many is fond of saying.
And this nonsense should be removed:
The (norwegian) Government Lion - a totem-animal, that means following ones lust.
Oslo City Hall, "acidtrip"-image of "St. Hallvard" with a derogatory view on women, and really the same as the lion.
are ultranationalists today, and Breiviks (norwegian massmurderer)
two other cells, are ofcourse "Fjordman" and "Lionheart", that he
voices in this way. This psychiatry did not understand, and saw
tics and many others things, completely deluded. No expertise
there. While monotheism teaches about idolaters.
"Kongsbergs" (Kingshill) emblem has again a man with a divided head.
Our Lord is One. He has no partners.
Mark 12:29 "The most important one," answered Jesus, "is this: 'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.
Peace Be With You.
TRANSLATION OF THE QURANIC PRAYER.
A well-translated prayer is important for correct godconsciousness:
"In the name of God, The Beneficial, Most Merciful.
Praised be God, The Lord of The World, The Beneficial, Most Merciful.
Posessor of The Day of Reckoning.
Only you we worship, and only you we ask for help.
Lead us on the straight way, the way of those you have blessed.
Not the way of those who incurred your wrath, and not those who go astray."
“I Guds navn, Den Velgjørende, Høyst Nådige.
Priset være Gud, Verdens Herre, Den Velgjørende, Høyst Nådige.
Besitter av Oppgjørets Dag.
Bare deg tilber vi, og bare deg ber vi om hjelp.
Led oss på den rake vei, veien til de du har velsignet.
Ikke veien til de som pådro seg din vrede, og ikke de som går feil.”
Peace Be With You.
ENABLE THE INDIVIDUAL
Religion in practise will become politics.
A system or government should only enable the Godcreated individual, within conservative human values.
of the commune, and make commonalities where there are none, is
actually facistic ideology, and oppression of the natural man.
Meaningless and irrational slavery to an ideological concept,
that is not real.
is without any pantheon. And public instances should only exist if
needed. And situations of care should be disassociated from the
teachings of psychiatry.
of government principles will also be an enormous effectivization, and
a public network (for instance, instead of state owned TV), where
people can have a profile, sell and make money on digital goods,
and make transactions, advertise and search on qualities, would
be good for stimulation of an intelligent economy, and media
culture. Moderation of this should ofcourse only be by
relevant law, and those involved with it, in accordance to
principles like other places, without bias from laymen.
Praised Be God, Lord Of The World, Whom Teaches By The Pen., Whom We Worship. The Beneficial, The Most Merciful.
Peace Be With You.